Not using quantum-resistant schemes #79

Open
opened 2026-04-07 08:09:46 +00:00 by Skipper · 1 comment
Owner

Recent papers, hypes and development of quantum computing render Schorr's attack of ed25519, RSA and ECDSA more feasiable and feasible day-to-day.
However, we have advantage of greenfield project, so there is nothing to migrate yet.

My proposal is to replace our core asymmetric cryptography with post-quantum schemes.

Concrete steps

  1. Evaluating rust crates for PQ cryptography
  2. Replacing AuthPublicKey with ML-DSA scheme
  3. Figuring out how to connect secure element (Secure Enclave, TPM2) key protection to all of that

Relevant articles

Recent papers, hypes and development of quantum computing render Schorr's attack of ed25519, RSA and ECDSA more feasiable and feasible day-to-day. However, we have advantage of greenfield project, so there is nothing to migrate yet. My proposal is to replace our core asymmetric cryptography with post-quantum schemes. # Concrete steps 1. Evaluating rust crates for PQ cryptography 2. Replacing `AuthPublicKey` with ML-DSA scheme 3. Figuring out how to connect secure element (Secure Enclave, TPM2) key protection to all of that # Relevant articles - https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28627 - https://research.google/blog/safeguarding-cryptocurrency-by-disclosing-quantum-vulnerabilities-responsibly/ - https://words.filippo.io/crqc-timeline/
Skipper added the
Compat
Breaking
Kind
Security
Priority
High
2
labels 2026-04-07 08:09:59 +00:00
Skipper self-assigned this 2026-04-07 13:39:54 +00:00
Member
Useful top-level research: https://gemini.google.com/share/0d54d7176359
Sign in to join this conversation.
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: MarketTakers/arbiter#79