fix(wallet): delete access entries by entry ID instead of wallet ID

server/crates/arbiter-server/src/peers/operator/session/handlers.rs

@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ impl OperatorSession {
             use crate::db::schema::evm_wallet_access;
             for entry in entries {
                 diesel::delete(evm_wallet_access::table)
-                    .filter(evm_wallet_access::wallet_id.eq(entry))
+                    .filter(evm_wallet_access::id.eq(entry))
                     .execute(&mut *conn)
                     .await?;
             }
@@ -289,3 +289,142 @@ impl OperatorSession {
         Ok(clients)
     }
 }
+
+#[cfg(test)]
+mod tests {
+    use crate::db::{self, models::NewEvmWalletAccess, schema::evm_wallet_access};
+    use diesel::{ExpressionMethods as _, QueryDsl as _, SelectableHelper};
+    use diesel_async::{AsyncConnection, RunQueryDsl};
+
+    /// Regression test: revocation must delete by access-entry `id`, not by `wallet_id`.
+    ///
+    /// Before the fix, revoking entry_id=1 would delete all rows where wallet_id=1,
+    /// wiping out every client's access to wallet #1.
+    #[tokio::test]
+    async fn revoke_deletes_by_entry_id_not_wallet_id() {
+        use crate::db::models::EvmWalletAccess;
+
+        let pool = db::create_test_pool().await;
+        let mut conn = pool.get().await.expect("pool connection");
+
+        // Insert two access entries for the same wallet but different clients.
+        // entry A: id will be 1, wallet_id=1, client_id=10
+        // entry B: id will be 2, wallet_id=1, client_id=20
+        let entry_a = diesel::insert_into(evm_wallet_access::table)
+            .values(NewEvmWalletAccess {
+                wallet_id: 1,
+                client_id: 10,
+            })
+            .returning(EvmWalletAccess::as_select())
+            .get_result(&mut *conn)
+            .await
+            .expect("insert entry A");
+
+        let entry_b = diesel::insert_into(evm_wallet_access::table)
+            .values(NewEvmWalletAccess {
+                wallet_id: 1,
+                client_id: 20,
+            })
+            .returning(EvmWalletAccess::as_select())
+            .get_result(&mut *conn)
+            .await
+            .expect("insert entry B");
+
+        // Revoke only entry A by its primary key id.
+        conn.transaction(async |conn| {
+            diesel::delete(evm_wallet_access::table)
+                .filter(evm_wallet_access::id.eq(entry_a.id))
+                .execute(&mut *conn)
+                .await
+        })
+        .await
+        .expect("revoke entry A");
+
+        // Entry A must be gone.
+        let gone = evm_wallet_access::table
+            .filter(evm_wallet_access::id.eq(entry_a.id))
+            .count()
+            .get_result::<i64>(&mut *conn)
+            .await
+            .expect("count entry A");
+        assert_eq!(gone, 0, "revoked entry must be deleted");
+
+        // Entry B (same wallet, different client) must still exist.
+        let still_there = evm_wallet_access::table
+            .filter(evm_wallet_access::id.eq(entry_b.id))
+            .count()
+            .get_result::<i64>(&mut *conn)
+            .await
+            .expect("count entry B");
+        assert_eq!(still_there, 1, "unrelated entry must not be deleted");
+    }
+
+    /// Regression test: when entry_id and wallet_id differ, only the correct row is removed.
+    ///
+    /// This specifically catches the case where entry.id=5 and wallet_id=1 are different values;
+    /// the old bug would delete by wallet_id, potentially matching a completely different entry.
+    #[tokio::test]
+    async fn revoke_with_mismatched_wallet_and_entry_ids() {
+        use crate::db::models::EvmWalletAccess;
+
+        let pool = db::create_test_pool().await;
+        let mut conn = pool.get().await.expect("pool connection");
+
+        // Insert entries to force auto-increment IDs to diverge from wallet_ids.
+        // We'll insert 5 placeholder entries first so that the real entry gets id=6.
+        for i in 1_i32..=5 {
+            diesel::insert_into(evm_wallet_access::table)
+                .values(NewEvmWalletAccess {
+                    wallet_id: 99,
+                    client_id: i,
+                })
+                .execute(&mut *conn)
+                .await
+                .expect("insert placeholder");
+        }
+
+        // Real target: wallet_id=1, will get id=6.
+        let target = diesel::insert_into(evm_wallet_access::table)
+            .values(NewEvmWalletAccess {
+                wallet_id: 1,
+                client_id: 1,
+            })
+            .returning(EvmWalletAccess::as_select())
+            .get_result(&mut *conn)
+            .await
+            .expect("insert target");
+
+        // Sanity: target.id != target.wallet_id
+        assert_ne!(
+            target.id, target.wallet_id,
+            "test prerequisite: id and wallet_id must differ"
+        );
+
+        // Revoke by entry id.
+        conn.transaction(async |conn| {
+            diesel::delete(evm_wallet_access::table)
+                .filter(evm_wallet_access::id.eq(target.id))
+                .execute(&mut *conn)
+                .await
+        })
+        .await
+        .expect("revoke target");
+
+        let remaining = evm_wallet_access::table
+            .filter(evm_wallet_access::id.eq(target.id))
+            .count()
+            .get_result::<i64>(&mut *conn)
+            .await
+            .expect("count target");
+        assert_eq!(remaining, 0, "target must be deleted by its entry id");
+
+        // Placeholders for wallet_id=99 must be untouched.
+        let placeholders = evm_wallet_access::table
+            .filter(evm_wallet_access::wallet_id.eq(99))
+            .count()
+            .get_result::<i64>(&mut *conn)
+            .await
+            .expect("count placeholders");
+        assert_eq!(placeholders, 5, "unrelated entries must survive");
+    }
+}